Tag Archives: noneconomic damages

Court Holds “Bodily Injury” Damages Include “Pain and Suffering” and “Non-economic Damages” In “Motor Vehicle” Accident Claims Against Government

I previously wrote a short post about this case, but since I authored an amicus curiae brief for Michigan Townships Association, and the counties of Oakland, Wayne and Macomb, I have engaged in a bit more analysis. The Supreme Court released its … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative Law, Appeals, Appeals and Legal Research, Appellate Lawyer, Comparative Law, Governmental Immunity, Highway Defect Claims, Insurance and Indemnity, Insurance Coverage, Insurance Law, Insurance Lawyer, May It Please the Court, Michigan No-Fault Insurance, Michigan Supreme Court Opinions, Michigan Supreme Court Orders, Public Corporations, Recent Judicial Dispositions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Court Holds “Bodily Injury” Damages Include “Pain and Suffering” and “Non-economic Damages” In “Motor Vehicle” Accident Claims Against Government

In a much awaited opinion, the Michigan Supreme Court has held that a claimant may recover “nonecconomic damages” such as “pain and suffering” and “emotional distress” damages and excess “economic damages” in actions against the government under the “motor vehicle” … Continue reading

Gallery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court to Address Interplay (If Any) Between the No-Fault Act and the Governmental Tort Liability Act

Last Friday, September 19, 2014, I participated in a panel discussion at the Negligence Law Section breakout at the state bar conference in Grand Rapids to discuss the Michigan Supreme Court’s upcoming (October 8) hearing of oral arguments in the calendar … Continue reading

Gallery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court Poised to Address Damages Claims Against Government for Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicles

As I mentioned in a previous post, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a reconsideration and Grant Order, and a Consolidation Order, with respect to the Court of Appeals’ decisions in Hunter v. Sisco, et al. and Hannay v. MDOT cases and will consider them together as calendar … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile Insurance Claims, Comparative Law, Governmental Immunity, Insurance and Indemnity, May It Please the Court, Michigan Court of Appeals Published Opinions, Michigan Court of Appeals Unpublished Opinions, Michigan No-Fault Insurance, Michigan Supreme Court Orders, No-Fault Law, Property and Casualty, Recent Judicial Dispositions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court to Consider Both “Noneconomic” and “Economic Benefits” Damages Cases Against Governmental Entities

As I had predicted in earlier posts (see below), and suggested in my amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court in Hannay v. MDOT, Supreme Court Docket No. 146763, yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order granting reconsideration of … Continue reading

Gallery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court to Consider “Scope” of Government’s Liability Under Motor Vehicle Exception and No-Fault Insurance Act

Yesterday, I filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Michigan Townships Association, Oakland County, Macomb County, and Wayne County to challenge the Court of Appeals’ decision in Hannay v. Michigan Department of Transportation. There the Court of Appeals ruled that “bodily … Continue reading

Gallery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Michigan Supreme Court Denies Leave in Two of Three Cases Pending to Address Legal Causation Under No-Fault Act for Motorcycle Accidents

Last week I filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in the State Farm v. MMRMA case pending on application to the Michigan Supreme Court.  As I mentioned in my last post, there were two other cases, both … Continue reading

Gallery | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment