The Supreme Court has let stand a Court of Appeals decision, which held that a doctor’s alleged misdiagnosis and ultimate removal of a cancerous kidney gave rise to a cause of action for damages because of the potential for greater future harm due to the additional risk associated with having only one functional organ.
Lawrence Garcia, Esq. and myself submitted an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel in this case before the Supreme Court in which we urged the Court to allow the Court of Appeals decision to stand.
Here is the brief:
Previous posts about this case can be accessed here:
Please let me know if you have any questions…
View original post 825 more words